To begin the verdict, let's start with the specifications. ![]() ![]() The latter is a price that anyone who isn't a professional doesn't necessarily want to pay.But with the serious-enthusiast market booming and the race for a affordable full-frame on, this is gap that the Nikon D600 was made to fill - and it has, somewhat.Ĭlick NEXT to read further. Yet, the problem with full-frames is that while they almost always mean better photographic capability, the payoff is that the cameras are bulkier and mandatorily more expensive. Theoretically, that should make the D600 deliver better image quality across the board, particularly low-light performance, compared to, for instance, the Nikon D7000, a great camera in its own right but with a smaller APS-C sensor size. That means the D600 has an image sensor about the same size as that of a 35mm film, which used to be the norm back in the day before the digital revolution. ![]() Much of that is because of one term: Full-frame. For a camera that's been often called one of the photographic world's worst kept secrets in recent years, the D600 was supposed to be a near-perfect combination of a solid full-frame camera and affordability.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |